Natanael Cano Smashes His Own Mercedes-AMG G 63 Because He Disliked the Paint Color, Then Claims the Incident Was Artificial Intelligence

Natanael Cano, the Mexican corridos tumbados singer, once again became the center of online conversation after sharing a series of videos showing him throwing stones at his own Mercedes-AMG G 63, causing damage to several parts of the vehicle. What made the story spread faster than the footage itself was the explanation attached to it: the singer implied he was no longer happy with the truck because it came in a different color.

The clips were originally posted through the stories feature on Natanael Cano's Instagram account and remained visible for only a few hours. The singer later deleted the posts, but by then the images had already begun circulating on other platforms and had generated a large number of reactions among his followers.

The posts that preceded the stone throwing

Before showing the moment he damaged the vehicle, Natanael Cano appeared in another recording, filmed from inside a car, in which he talked about some of the luxury items he owns. In that same post, the singer also mentioned that he was looking for a woman to whom he could gift a block of property along with several Rolex watches.

He then introduced another vehicle in his collection: a Mercedes-AMG G 63, a high-end sport utility vehicle that ended up becoming the main subject of the recordings. While pointing the camera at the truck, Cano wrote in the caption that he no longer liked it because it was painted in a different color.

It was at that point that the singer picked up several stones and began throwing them directly at the vehicle. According to the footage shared by the artist himself, Natanael Cano threw three stones at the truck, causing visible damage to several parts of the unit.

The impacts and the condition of the vehicle

The hits were not merely staged for the camera. In the recordings, the objects could be seen striking the Mercedes-AMG G 63 forcefully, shattering the windows and damaging other areas of the bodywork. This detail made the story even harder to understand, since the destruction was carried out deliberately and recorded with the owner's own equipment.

The context made the scene even more shocking. The Mercedes-AMG G 63 belongs to the legendary G-Class line from Mercedes-Benz, is fitted with a twin-turbocharged V8 engine, and typically starts at around 180,000 US dollars in the United States before taxes, fees and personalized options. In Mexico, where Natanael Cano lives and works, the real price of the model is usually considerably higher because of import duties and registration costs.

For an artist at the peak of his career to personally damage an asset worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and then publish the footage to millions of followers is a rare event, even in an entertainment world long accustomed to attention-grabbing stunts.

Fans worry, the artist deletes the posts

After the images began to spread, part of his audience expressed concern about the singer's behavior and questioned whether he was doing well. Comments of that kind appeared in large numbers on the platforms that reposted the content, especially on TikTok and X, where short clips taken from the Instagram stories circulated at high speed.

What is certain is that Natanael Cano decided to remove the stories from his Instagram account shortly after posting them, thereby deleting the moment he damaged the truck from his profile. The deletion, however, did nothing to stop the spread, since the content had already been saved and reposted by numerous other accounts.

The artificial intelligence claim

After the controversy, Natanael Cano returned to social media to address the images. This time he adopted a joking tone, suggesting that what his followers had just watched might have been the product of artificial intelligence.

His comment triggered a fresh wave of reactions, because the original recordings had been published from his own account. Invoking artificial intelligence as an explanation also raised questions about how seriously the artist takes his own public statements, and reflected a notable trend in contemporary social media culture: when controversial content surfaces, denying it with an artificial-intelligence reference has become an almost reflexive response.

The singer later offered no further detailed explanation of whether the truck was actually damaged or whether some other reason lay behind the incident. That silence left an information gap that the online community continues to fill with speculation.

Who is Natanael Cano

Natanael Cano was born in 2026 in Hermosillo, in the state of Sonora, Mexico. He is regarded as one of the pioneers of corridos tumbados, a genre that blends traditional Mexican music with elements of hip-hop, trap and reggaeton. His career exploded in 2026 with hits that carried corridos tumbados from a local scene onto international charts.

His success paved the way for a generation of young Mexican artists who draw on traditional material in a modern way, while also bringing the cultural imagery of Sonora and the northern Mexican borderlands to a global audience. He is also an artist who regularly appears on streaming charts and commands an enormous following on digital platforms.

Alongside his music, Natanael Cano's public image is closely tied to a lavish lifestyle: luxury cars, expensive jewelry and designer clothing. This is a fairly common aesthetic in the corridos tumbados world, where displaying material achievement is treated as part of the identity and as a tool for building a personal brand.

The Mercedes-AMG G 63 and its symbolic weight

The Mercedes-AMG G 63 is not simply a means of transport. Over the years it has become a pop-culture icon, appearing frequently in music videos, in artists' collections and even in the asset lists of professional athletes.

Its distinctive boxy silhouette, V8 soundtrack and strong performance have kept the G-Class appealing for decades. For artists, owning a G 63 is often seen as a milestone marking financial success.

That is precisely why Natanael Cano throwing stones at this truck over its paint color creates such a strong visual contradiction: a symbol of success damaged by its own owner over an aesthetic detail that could be changed by wrapping the entire bodywork.

Technically, changing the color of a G 63 can be done with a vinyl wrap or a repaint, at a cost far lower than the value of the vehicle and far lower than the damage caused by the stones. The windshield, side windows and body components of Mercedes-AMG models carry high replacement prices, not to mention the cost of restoring paintwork and sensors mounted on the body.

The culture of displaying wealth online

The Natanael Cano incident sits within a broader trend: young artists using luxury assets as content material to sustain engagement with their audience. A luxury car, a Rolex watch or an expensive piece of jewelry can all become the subject of a stream of posts, short videos and online discussions.

In this model, the value of an asset lies not only in its usefulness but also in its ability to generate attention. When an item can no longer generate positive attention, replacing it is normal. What differs in Natanael Cano's case is the method of replacement: instead of reselling or trading the vehicle, he chose to destroy it on camera.

The act raises the question of where the line runs between entertainment content and harmful behavior. From a media perspective, it produces an instant attention effect. From another perspective, it sends a message that assets can be discarded without weighing consequences, even though much of the artist's audience is young.

Similar precedents in entertainment

Artists destroying their own property is not unprecedented. In rock history, many performers have smashed instruments or equipment on stage as part of the show. In sport, some athletes have damaged personal equipment after a defeat to express frustration.

What differs in the modern era is the recording and distribution factor. Where similar acts in the past were witnessed only by those physically present, today any behavior can become global content within minutes. That makes the media consequences far larger than the material damage itself.

Media and the attention economy

The Natanael Cano incident illustrates clearly how the attention economy works. A controversial act is posted, then deleted, followed by an ambiguous response, and finally by silence. Each step in that sequence generates a fresh wave of content: articles, analysis videos, comments and debate.

As a result, the media value of the incident can far exceed the value of the damaged truck. This is a familiar paradox of the social media age, in which attention becomes a currency and baffling behavior can deliver visibility benefits.

Open questions

So far there is no independent confirmation of the actual condition of the Mercedes-AMG G 63 after the incident. It is also unclear whether the truck was repaired, replaced or resold. Natanael Cano's side has issued no further official statement beyond the joking comment about artificial intelligence.

Other questions remain unanswered: whether the video was entirely staged, whether any advertising element was involved, and whether the act will affect the singer's commercial deals.

Impact on the artist's image

For an artist with a large following, every public act helps shape the personal brand. This incident adds another layer to Natanael Cano's image: an unpredictable artist who likes to surprise and is not afraid to push the limits of what counts as normal behavior.

In the short term, that may reinforce attention from loyal fans. In the long term, it may create risk if commercial partners feel the image no longer fits their positioning. It is the kind of calculation many young artists face when building a career on a controversial persona.

Conclusion

The incident in which Natanael Cano threw stones at his own Mercedes-AMG G 63 because he disliked its paint color is a multi-layered story: a shocking act, a lightning-fast media reaction, an ambiguous explanation and an information gap that remains unfilled. What is certain is that the episode achieved its goal of attracting attention, while also raising questions about an artist's responsibility toward property, toward the audience and toward his own image in the social media era.